Attempt a comparative assessment, after Huxley between past pleasure and present.]
Attempt a comparative assessment, after Huxley between past
pleasure and present.]
The difference between the two sorts of pleasure is set down by
the author at the very beginning of his essay. He means by the modern
pleasures, ‘not real pleasure, but the organised activities officially known by
the same name’, pleasure.
Modern pleasure arises from the organized distraction which makes in
rapidly stupid. There was a time when men indulged in distraction becomes it
required intellectual efforts. In the 17th century England royal personages and their
courtiers took delight in hearing learned sermons and academical- debates on
theology or metaphysics. Another example of intellectual real pleasure that was
offered during the marriage ceremony of Pataline with James’s daughter is also
mentioned. No such pleasure is enjoyed during the recent time.
Not only the royal personages
but the every lady and gentleman of ordinary culture could enjoy the
intellectual pleasure. In the Elizabethan period those people could, if
situation demanded, took part in part song for several voices, usually
unaccompaniment. One who has the real knowledge regarding the complexity of the
sixteenth century music can realize that taking part to that madrigal is not
easy one in spite of one’s sufficient intellectuality. Our forefathers enjoyed
the pleasure in the truest sense of the term. Even the uneducated person
delighted in listening to such complex dramas like — Othello, King Lear, and
Hamlet etc. Even in the remote country the peasants celebrated the traditions
rites by dancing, singing, winter mummings etc throughout the year. Their
pleasure was lively, intelligent because they entertained themselves by their
own efforts.
Unfortunately we have changed
all that. In place of intellectual pleasure we have vast organizations to
provide us ready-made distraction that demands no intellectual efforts of any
sort. In
place of the old pleasures demanding intelligence and personal initiative, we
have vast organizations that provide us with ready-made
distractions—distractions—which demand from pleasure-seekers no personal
participation and no intellectual effort of any sort.” Million of cinemas bring
nothing but the meaningless flow of words and words only. The writes of these
cinemas are almost nonsense so their works never cross the boundaries of the
cities. Now-a-days the whole world by the invention of scenario-writer is
continuously soaking passively in the lukewarm water of nonsense. It demands no
mental effort, no participation, only sit and keep the eyes open. —“Countless audience
soak passively in the tepid bath of nonsense.” They need no mental effort, no
intellectual response, no actual participation. They need only sit and keep
their eyes and ears open and let the film go in its own way
If one wants to listen music one can get it
only switching on the gramophone and if necessary for a change he can get
another by adjusting to the right wave-length. For literature they turn to
Press. But all these never demand intellectuality your mind, therefore, will
find no fatigue and it will go one years after years bearing the name of
success.
Equally passive and standardized is the dance today. Previously
men and women danced, took intense interest in their craft and even tried to
express their personal talent in the same. But the situation has an unfortunate
change. All classes still dance, but dance, all the world over, in the same
steps to the same tunes. Huxley’s comment, in this connection, is sharp and
lays bare the hard fact—“The dance has been scrupulously sterilized of any
local or personal individuality”.
Comments
Post a Comment